Відео

Sigma is pretty nice. I just think it’s too big if I can don’t use haha.

Hmm I didn’t use the susvara on either before. But I compared the serenade using the stealth with amps like burson before. At that point, I think burson was better

Yes. But most of that bass is in the sub bass region

Should have no issue. I driven HD650 and ZMF Atrium open which is very similar.

@@ZPProductions Thankyou

I don’t think any modern dacs will have huge differences really haha.

Laiv recently very popular most youtuber review it very positive some comments say even better the holo may or other. I planing to upgrade spring 3 KTE to holo May KTE if turn out good definitely I getting one I save alot. By the way good review

Thanks!

Do you mean flare? Didn’t get to shoot something that will cause it during my testing period

@@ZPProductions Yes, this is what I meant. Reason for my question is that I saw images with pretty subpar performance. Even the RF 50mm f1.2 has some issues with it.

@@bokehbeauty hmm I have tried with a flash direct in frame and I don't see any serious flaring issues. More test is needed but many times the reason why there is bad flare/hazing is cause of either filter there's a smudge in the front element. Filters are th biggest cause and I always remove them if I am doing back litted shots regardless of lens.

@@ZPProductions Hi, thank you very much for taking my concern into account!! You may also have a look at the findings of a German UA-cam colleague ua-cam.com/video/_a0A1R_xikU/v-deo.html

I’m inclined to probably agree with them. Rs10 tuning is really flat and probaby only will appeal to a niche audience

Just use some Hoya or anything you feel reputable enough. The whole purpose of the filter for me is really to use my tshirt to wipe it haha.

@@ZPProductions yea

@@mike.k aren't you afraid of degrading the optical quality ? A cloth won't damage the lens.

@@mousbleu that’s also good point 👍🏻😎 and make sense, yea spending money for 2000$+ lens and then cover it with cheaper additional piece of glass… so yea maybe I will use it also without any filter hehe , and with filter in extreme situation like sand storm or heavy rain etc

​@@mike.k I once had the lens cap fall off my EF 24-70 2.8 II during transportation. Rubbing between the lens cap and the front element during transport has left a scratch on the latter. Since then I use high quality clear or UV filters ( B+W, Breakthrough and Polar Pro). I know that a small scratch won't affect the IQ, but the front element coating peeling off with wear is much more worrying to me, as I've already experienced this problem with my own glasses.

Oh any Nikon mount speed lite will do

Ifi can go way louder with less distortion

@@ZPProductions thanks for replying. There is no other difference between these two on SQ beside ifi can go louder? I have a monarch mkiii, still hesitating if I should go with moondrop evo or ifi go pod.

It’s 2389 SGD

Thats true. But I from practical stand point, of using a R3, I probably don't want to rest it on a small hood like 35mm haha. That said the petal hood in real world will probably block more flare

Sadly no. Can’t give you feedback on it

I think lens sharpness wise its similar. I remember I compared with the sigma before for the Sony and they are about the same ball park. The Sony has high amount of focus breathing and definitely not great for video. But it is lighter and more affordable. That said this is more of Sony vs Canon, and the system as a like Sony aggressive AF speed vs Canon more accurate eye detection probably matters more

As an owner of Sony A7IV and 35mm GM. If I was offered to switch systems for free and had to get this lens, I wouldn't switch. The Sony one is superior i every but one way. The image quality is better, the especially the corners, cost is lower, I can actually use the aperture ring. The one thing Canon has better is focus breathing, which can be corrected in newer Sony cameras, as is my A7IV in video. For photography there is no correction, but it makes no difference. I'm waiting for the Canon fanboys, which fantasize about the bigger Canon RF mount being better than Sony's small E mount. This lens a big middle finger to that statement.

@@Sqeezy3 Actually it also looses in light transmission. Other than that, if you are looking at extreme corner, the sony 35mm is better. But I won't use sony camera , owning the A1 for a good 2 years with my canon. For me doing portraits, canon is just more reliable eye af wise. Maybe the next gen A1 II ill come back to try again.

@@Sqeezy3 I shoot both systems, so it doesn’t matter to me. Just wanted to know if there’s any drastic difference between them. More for my excitement before I get my hands on the Canon 35 1.4. Either way I would still buy it cause i use the 35mm the most.

DACs are tricky as they are very complicated to swap around with 2 cables while in such a test for amps, I usually use a xlr to stereo and level their volume with quick swaps into my DAPs. Also I don't have as many DACs, mainly DAPs.

Yup, it’s pretty good for long sessions.

I don't have a comparison here but I tested both out at Zeppelin before. I personally prefer the Atrium. Forgotten how it exactly sounds though

I went to search my past notes, the caldera had some sibilance and elevated treble which was little too much for me. It runs more on the neutral cooler side whereas the Atrium is neutral warm side

Yes it’s worth the weight savings. I’ll pay the money for just the weight saving. optically it’s very similar to the sigma 40mm but it’s faster, more accurate and lighter

@@ZPProductionsThanks for the reply. I haven’t used or even handled the Sigma 40mm but I’m interested because of the high praise it gets everywhere.

@@michaelsteingraber9866 Hallo Michael, wenn du bei all dem zügellosen Jubel auch einmal einen kritischen Test sehen willst, dann schau doch auf dem Channel von Davision vorbei. Grüße

@@Bigmystery Habe ich heute Morgen angesehen! Danke für den Tip!

@@michaelsteingraber9866 I use one today on L Mount. Lumix S1R without adapter ie native. Heavy and long but worth it to me. Stunning image quality, I also have the 28mm 1.4 sigma which is also excellent.The 40mm does everything including landscapes, I use a separate lens support when on tripod for stability and the sharpness is blistering but smooth

Yeah I went to read up a little and its the pentaconn. Its a rather rare connector

eeleezeeun

All is good as long as we know what we are saying haha

@@ZPProductions Was messing around bro. Love your editing style. Keep it up dude.

Not much stuff I like there this days and hard to get loaner sets for review. But I’ll that said I’ll be publishing a lens review tonight haha

Np. Hope it was useful haha!

Yes u can

I personally thing ferrum as the main is better. Burson has a signature of its own. My fav is a Enleum hpa23-rm for all but the most intense headphones haha

I got it from audio anything and SSL last time

It’s better then titan with switch 1 engage. It’s titan with better clarity and highs but about the same amount of bass based on memory. The only thing more bassy is scarlet mini

@@ZPProductions Wow sounds like a real killer. Not a fan of the Scarlet mini (prefer Titan). But if the Aehta is better than Titan then I might not need a dedicated basshead set in my collection. Seems like a real gem. Thanks for covering this.

@@ZPProductions Btw any driver flex on this?

@@yogiwp_ not that I notice

First I want to say comparison is UIEM type since there’s a large discrepancy in terms of ciems impressions. First I find the GM for me sits in a weird position. Either there is bass but alittle dull in the mids & highs, or no bass but really nice extended mids & highs. MSE is like the best of GM highs (though alittle thinner but sparklier) with the bass somewhere between both modes of GM. The volur wise I feel it’s a u12t with better bass. I personally think MSE is slightly better in most regards except the body of mids which Volur/u12t is better.

@@ZPProductionsin terms of GM comparing the reproduction of music Radon 6 is a step above right?

@@ElNINETEENTH hmm I can’t compare to GM. But Rn6 vs MSE, if looking at absolute clarity and soundstage, MSE is better. But if it’s bass, energy and tonality I prefer Radon6.

I used quite a lot of wireless devices the sound is all ok. To me it’s about the practicality of design. I do think the ifi go pods are real expensive and only worth if you are using insensitive iem. I have other complaints about it too. The Evo device itself other then being faulty on my set, I think they are fine, just a little low on the power department. But the case and orientation of storage just really don’t consider how customers will want to use it.

Actually it really depends on how they are implemented. BCD can be of different frequencies and they will add additional depth/feeling to the sound of this frequencies. DD on the other hand is about bass response and how much it can push. There’s many DD designs from 7mm to 12mm so the number don’t really mean much other then it should have a theoretically better bass response and depth if more DD

@@ZPProductions Wondering about the end result, does it end up noticeably better than other TOTLs with just single DD and without BC? For example how does it compare against the much more expensive Radon 6?

@@yogiwp_ I don’t think it’s better or worst since that’s heavily influenced in how they tune and use it. At least the tuning is quite different that I can’t objectively say one is better than the other .

But I do enjoy the tuning of the radon 6 a touch more.

Don’t quite understand what you are saying. The trigger don’t work with one shot? Does it mean it never fires or never fires for the first shot? Also what transmitter are you using.

@@ZPProductions Hello, thank you very much for responding, I have the Godox XPRO IIN transmitter, I connect it to the Hasellblad and when shooting it only works once, then I shoot again and nothing. That only happens to me with the Godox ad600bm flash, why did I buy another flash, the Godox sk400ii and it works normally.

You will not be disappointed at all great iem works with everything.

I think at headfi most do think radon 6 is better. I personally didn’t try the xe6 before. But at least Rn6 will be good haha. Though I don’t quite know what to expect in the customs edition since in universals, rolling tips matter

@@ZPProductions Spnfit CP100 is good. Customs are good but I’m afraid my ear shape changes every year. Yea most people say RN6 is the better iem but I’m a mid bass junkie and thats what the XE6 offers over the RN6.

I don’t own the XE6. But I been lurking in the forum and most do say they sound quite different.

@@ZPProductions would own the Volür having the RN6 ? Or it’s not worth it since Radon better?

@@ElNINETEENTH I think radon 6 is nicer to listen then u12t for me. I did extensive testing against the volur when I bought my u12t, I will pick radon 6 over volur.

@@ZPProductions comparing to Empire ears and Fatfreq iems would you choose Radon ?

@@ElNINETEENTH don’t know about EE, long time since I tried them. I have the maestro Se and scarlet. I like the radon 6 more than fatfreq.

Yeah I heard the Volur before. To me it was U12T with better bass. But Radon is quite different, it’s wider in sound stage with a punchier bass then u12T. The mids are also rendered differently as there’s a peak there to push male / lower register of the vocals forward a little

I've not just heard but owned all three and the Volur was my favorite with u12t second

@@Abhi-wn7swyou mean Volür and u12t better than RN6 for you ?

Any sensitive frequencies for u? For me the KZ need to tame highs alittle, so something like divinus or tanchjim bass boost tips. I personally won’t go down to final audio type e as that will have a veil to me.

@@ZPProductions thanks, I will try them down the road